Interesting topics for paper presentation

Additionally, the President has decided to share, in this document, certain key elements of these standards and procedures with the American people so that they can make informed judgments and hold the Executive Branch accountable. The Third Review Conference of States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention, taking place recently in The Hague from April 8-19, was a benchmark occasion to review the operation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and evaluate related scientific and technological developments. In his presentation, he shared his vision of the measures needed to decrease the chance. All these issues remind us that the choices we make about war can impact – in sometimes unintended ways – the openness and freedom on which our way of life depends. The first question was on how to address the existing reservations to the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of’ Warfare (1925 Geneva Protocol). Maybe that’s because he doesn’t have a lot to work with.

Public speaking helps you get rid of stage fright and boosts confidence. Article 16 of the Rome Statute gives the Security Council just that power — although it would have to pass a new deferral resolution each year, because Article 16 limits individual deferrals to 12-month increments. Brennan when he was Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, it is based on the notion that, “[t]here is nothing in international law that prohibits us from using lethal force against our enemies outside of an active battlefield, at least when the country involved consents or is unable or unwilling to take action against the threat. It is in direct opposition to the political and international law position on settlements. All authors will be required to submit a draft paper 4 weeks before the Research Forum as a condition for participation. Especially critical among the statements of strategy in light of the series of recent hearings in Congress on the need for a revised AUMF was the President’s announced refusal to expand it:.
 In this situation, the non-state actors are primary players, but because they operate effectively free from domestic regulations or restraints, their clashes are not clearly governed by international or domestic laws. Third, and finally, CCR claims that ATS lawsuits involving war crimes and torture should always be deemed to satisfy Kiobel, especially where — as in Al Shimari — the perpetrators of those crimes are present in the US. In this post, I focus on just one issue. The CIA learns through drone surveillance and a human informant that Osama bin Laden is having dinner with one of his wives inside his Abbottabad compound. It remains to be seen how the ICJ will approach these issues in the Whaling in the Antarctic Case, however it is to be hoped that the Court will refer to and endorse Article 48 of the ASR which provides an important avenue for public interest international environmental claims to be pursued.
There’s lots of serious international and national security talk to be had today following yesterday’s NDU address by President Obama.  This includes provisions for an international driving permit as well as for cross border recognition of foreign drivers licenses (Florida got itself into problems earlier in 2013 when it issued new regulations requiring foreign drivers, including Canadians, to hold a valid international driving permit; it quickly reversed course). This comment seeks to further the debate by raising two questions regarding the role of the flag state in terms of its international responsibility. But it is useful for the Chinese to float such ideas, so that they can gracefully back down and “settle” for the Diaoyu/Senkakus one day. Up to 12 papers will be selected for presentation. Speeches give you a platform to express yourself.
” – Robert Hensing about bootkits.   The Fourth Circuit concluded that the President’s recognition power includes the power to make dispositive determinations of status but not conduct based immunity. – Data archive and digital library. Constitutional law, and it is not clear why they would under international law.  However, the expansion of the US military into clandestine activities – which might or might not meet the legal definition of “covert” under Title 50 and so trigger those oversight functions – has raised new questions as to whether Armed Services committees oversight, traditionally conceived for conventional conflicts, keeps Congress sufficiently informed and permits sufficiently timely oversight in the case of activities carried by JSOC.
A couple of people have suggested to me that I should be celebrating Obama’s adoption of the “near certainty” standard, because it is more protective of civilians than the principle of proportionality. They always have, and they always will — no matter how “precise” weapons like drones become. 8(2)(b)(viii), nor does it mention crimes de guerre (war crimes) or transfert indirect (indirect transfer) — two obviously critical expressions in the French version of the Rome Statute. Still, the upcoming battle for the CRPD is a proxy for the entire U.
Results from a wide range of AI-related problems and encourage the presentation of a).  Abstracts containing identifying information will not be reviewed. While many commentators quickly observed that the Court did not explicitly rule on corporate liability, the majority opinion at least tacitly assumes the existence of corporate liability. Senate failed to give consent to U.  A dangerous game to play, unfortunately, and one that may backfire if it continues to foster anti-Chinese Japanese nationalism.

Interesting Topics For Paper Presentation

Summarizing the scholarly paper to be presented at the Forum. But maybe not even with youngsters on college campuses.  I want to raise something external to Kiobel and the ATS as “law” – the distinction between international law and what (in various postings here and there) I’ve referred to as the “law of the hegemon. ”  This sentence was quoted with approval in Justice Breyer’s concurrence. In such a case, the decision of the Prosecutor shall be effective only if confirmed by the Pre-Trial Chamber. Their proposal required a long time to gain support but during the last days of the Conference seemed somewhat certain to be adopted into the final document as the compromise draft enjoyed no substantive objections.
One can say that this is precisely the problem of the American court system in dealing with human rights cases; it ought to recognize the international law sources and authorities as such, rather than privileging its own processes. Australia has not made express its arguments on standing, such as by asserting any special interest in Japan’s conduct above and beyond that of any other party to the ICRW. Please comment on any topic of interest (civilised discussion and no coarse language. The ATS has been a boon for U. The suit, brought under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and federal question jurisdiction, brings claims arising from violations of U. The net effect is that there could be no party at all able to invoke the potential responsibility of Japan under the ICRW. Because for all the focus on the use of force, force alone cannot make us safe.
President Obama is now turning to “citizenship” almost like a drum beat.  In this situation, the non-state actors are primary players, but because they operate effectively free from domestic regulations or restraints, their clashes are not clearly governed by international or domestic laws. Third, and finally, CCR claims that ATS lawsuits involving war crimes and torture should always be deemed to satisfy Kiobel, especially where — as in Al Shimari — the perpetrators of those crimes are present in the US. In this post, I focus on just one issue. The CIA learns through drone surveillance and a human informant that Osama bin Laden is having dinner with one of his wives inside his Abbottabad compound. It remains to be seen how the ICJ will approach these issues in the Whaling in the Antarctic Case, however it is to be hoped that the Court will refer to and endorse Article 48 of the ASR which provides an important avenue for public interest international environmental claims to be pursued.
There’s lots of serious international and national security talk to be had today following yesterday’s NDU address by President Obama
He cannot bring himself to acknowledge that the US is — like every other country — willing to launch attacks that are likely to kill innocent civilians when it believes the targets are important enough. First, bravo on the President for giving it. As Administration officials have stated publicly on numerous occasions, we are continually working to refine, clarify, and strengthen our standards and processes for using force to keep the nation safe from the terrorist threat. 8(2)(b)(viii) thus prohibits a much broader range of actions than Art.   In the past, attempts by the Pakistani Army to regain control of areas of FATA have been humanitarian disasters. ) describes the significance of the case as follows:.
Second, Telesetsky asks in her conclusion (in reference to the Erika and the Prestige incidents) why flag states should not bear responsibility for damage caused by the vessels
Targeting operations in line with the international law of self defense. While Australia and Japan are confronting each other in The Hague (see the post by Natalie Klein), Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS), an American NGO, and the Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR), a Japanese research institution, fight strenuously in court and at sea. If Comoros asked the PTC to review a decision by the OTP not to investigate the attack on the flotilla, thereby triggering Art. No governments involved, at least not as parties to the agreement. Because for all the focus on the use of force, force alone cannot make us safe. So it is imperative that the Court update its website in a timely fashion.
Another, however, is that if this is supposed to be the working out in some broad sense of “international law” in American courts and using the tools available to American law, how does one keep the link between international law and its sources, processes, standards of interpretation, etc. So if the OTP reconsidered its decision and again concluded that a full investigation was not warranted, that would be the end of the story. The Fourth Circuit reasoned that with respect to head of state immunity the executive branch is entitled to absolute deference, but it receives only “substantial weight” for its determinations on conduct-based immunity. Japan’s view is that the Senkakus had perhaps had been part of Okinawa, but at any rate, had never been part of China pre-1895. Not entirely: the presence of actors other than States adds complexity to issues of international responsibility and raises a number of questions.
At 5 (citing Morrison for proposition that “question of extraterritorial application was a ‘merits question,’ not a question of jurisdiction”). If you've been asked to prepare a presentation, it's time to look for good topics for presentations and choose the one that suits you best. One institutional feature of note is that PCA offers a development assistance fund for states that require financial aid for use of PCA’s services. 140 Creative PowerPoint Presentation Topics for College Students. The Swiss statement also recognised the need for more transparency on ICA’s, positing that ICA’s could erode the Convention and proposed to start a more formalised and continuous discussion on the matter. We have given list of Interesting topics for paper Presentations.

Interesting Topics For Paper Presentation

” Indeed the Court framed the relevant question under the ATS as “whether the court has authority to recognize a cause of action under U. (Harold Koh, the former Legal Advisor to the U. Portugal has had similar measures in place since 2005.  It’s adulterated with either lower grade olive oil, or else the oil itself is mostly low grade olive oil heated to take out the bad flavors (heated oil is essentially flavorless), or else different plant oils altogether (such as cottonseed oil.
Essentially the dismissal rests on the doctrine of the separate legal identities of parent and subsidiary corporations. And that is why I intend to engage Congress about the existing Authorization to Use Military Force, or AUMF, to determine how we can continue to fight terrorists without keeping America on a perpetual war-time footing. The case was dismissed below in 2011, and the Court of Appeals upheld the decision last week. Core al Qaeda is a shell of its former self. Interested participants should submit an abstract (no more than 500 words in length) summarizing the scholarly paper to be presented at the Forum. Columbia University historian Samuel Moyn has a tough post up on the Foreign Affairs website on Kiobel and the arc of the Alien Tort Statute, which he sees as having served the narrow constituency of us rather than being true to the historical origins of human rights:.

7+ what a business proposal looks like - Budget Template

Regrettably, there has been an increase in tragic maritime incidents involving asylum seekers in recent years, not only in the Mediterranean, but also in other oceans seas including the Indian Ocean where several vessels carrying asylum seekers attempting to reach Australia have foundered, and there has been significant loss of life
Results from a wide range of AI-related problems and encourage the presentation of a).  Abstracts containing identifying information will not be reviewed. It also notes that the US’s control over Abu Ghraib is — or should be — relevant to the “touch and concern” analysis. While many commentators quickly observed that the Court did not explicitly rule on corporate liability, the majority opinion at least tacitly assumes the existence of corporate liability. Senate failed to give consent to U.  A dangerous game to play, unfortunately, and one that may backfire if it continues to foster anti-Chinese Japanese nationalism.
But maybe not even with youngsters on college campuses.  I want to raise something external to Kiobel and the ATS as “law” – the distinction between international law and what (in various postings here and there) I’ve referred to as the “law of the hegemon. ”  This sentence was quoted with approval in Justice Breyer’s concurrence. In such a case, the decision of the Prosecutor shall be effective only if confirmed by the Pre-Trial Chamber. Their proposal required a long time to gain support but during the last days of the Conference seemed somewhat certain to be adopted into the final document as the compromise draft enjoyed no substantive objections.
Australia has not made express its arguments on standing, such as by asserting any special interest in Japan’s conduct above and beyond that of any other party to the ICRW. Please comment on any topic of interest (civilised discussion and no coarse language. The ATS has been a boon for U. The suit, brought under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and federal question jurisdiction, brings claims arising from violations of U. The net effect is that there could be no party at all able to invoke the potential responsibility of Japan under the ICRW. Because for all the focus on the use of force, force alone cannot make us safe.
President Obama is now turning to “citizenship” almost like a drum beat.  In this situation, the non-state actors are primary players, but because they operate effectively free from domestic regulations or restraints, their clashes are not clearly governed by international or domestic laws. Third, and finally, CCR claims that ATS lawsuits involving war crimes and torture should always be deemed to satisfy Kiobel, especially where — as in Al Shimari — the perpetrators of those crimes are present in the US. Yoshinobu Takei’s interesting post charts recent developments in international fisheries law that have attempted to respond to the ongoing ‘tragedy of the commons’ that flows from the dominance of the Grotian vision of the high seas as a domain of freedom (to fish, and to enjoy the other accepted high seas freedoms). In this post, I focus on just one issue. The CIA learns through drone surveillance and a human informant that Osama bin Laden is having dinner with one of his wives inside his Abbottabad compound. It remains to be seen how the ICJ will approach these issues in the Whaling in the Antarctic Case, however it is to be hoped that the Court will refer to and endorse Article 48 of the ASR which provides an important avenue for public interest international environmental claims to be pursued.
There’s lots of serious international and national security talk to be had today following yesterday’s NDU address by President Obama.  This includes provisions for an international driving permit as well as for cross border recognition of foreign drivers licenses (Florida got itself into problems earlier in 2013 when it issued new regulations requiring foreign drivers, including Canadians, to hold a valid international driving permit; it quickly reversed course). This comment seeks to further the debate by raising two questions regarding the role of the flag state in terms of its international responsibility. But it is useful for the Chinese to float such ideas, so that they can gracefully back down and “settle” for the Diaoyu/Senkakus one day. Up to 12 papers will be selected for presentation. Speeches give you a platform to express yourself.
” – Robert Hensing about bootkits.   The Fourth Circuit concluded that the President’s recognition power includes the power to make dispositive determinations of status but not conduct based immunity. – Data archive and digital library. Constitutional law, and it is not clear why they would under international law. If Ruto is confident of acquittal, his opposition to deferring the prosecution makes perfect sense: he will have much more freedom to operate as an acquitted war criminal than as an accused one. As a result it was important for Obama to outline the alternatives to the continued use of drones in places where the local government is unable or unwilling to counter a terror threat to the US.  However, the expansion of the US military into clandestine activities – which might or might not meet the legal definition of “covert” under Title 50 and so trigger those oversight functions – has raised new questions as to whether Armed Services committees oversight, traditionally conceived for conventional conflicts, keeps Congress sufficiently informed and permits sufficiently timely oversight in the case of activities carried by JSOC.

More Interesting Topics For Paper Presentation

Another extraordinary rendition case has been launched in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that will be relevant to those following Guantanamo detainees:  Abu Zubaydah v Poland involves the CIA’s black sites. A couple of people have suggested to me that I should be celebrating Obama’s adoption of the “near certainty” standard, because it is more protective of civilians than the principle of proportionality. The timing seems particularly curious given that Israel and Turkey appear to be making genuine diplomatic progress in resolving the Mavi Marmara crisis. They always have, and they always will — no matter how “precise” weapons like drones become. 8(2)(b)(viii), nor does it mention crimes de guerre (war crimes) or transfert indirect (indirect transfer) — two obviously critical expressions in the French version of the Rome Statute. Still, the upcoming battle for the CRPD is a proxy for the entire U.
 A dangerous game to play, unfortunately, and one that may backfire if it continues to foster anti-Chinese Japanese nationalism
Summarizing the scholarly paper to be presented at the Forum. But maybe not even with youngsters on college campuses.  I want to raise something external to Kiobel and the ATS as “law” – the distinction between international law and what (in various postings here and there) I’ve referred to as the “law of the hegemon. ”  This sentence was quoted with approval in Justice Breyer’s concurrence. In such a case, the decision of the Prosecutor shall be effective only if confirmed by the Pre-Trial Chamber. Their proposal required a long time to gain support but during the last days of the Conference seemed somewhat certain to be adopted into the final document as the compromise draft enjoyed no substantive objections.
Australia has not made express its arguments on standing, such as by asserting any special interest in Japan’s conduct above and beyond that of any other party to the ICRW. Please comment on any topic of interest (civilised discussion and no coarse language. The ATS has been a boon for U. The net effect is that there could be no party at all able to invoke the potential responsibility of Japan under the ICRW.
Additionally, the President has decided to share, in this document, certain key elements of these standards and procedures with the American people so that they can make informed judgments and hold the Executive Branch accountable. It could also rule out any challenge by any state against Japan’s whaling program. Tea Party chickens may come home to roost as their claims of Obama’s ineligibility (including by virtue of his non-citizen father, not just his imaginary birth in Kenya) are turned back against them. We simply cannot count on him to tell us the truth about the US’s national-security policy. That may set a long-term baseline from which to refine labor rights and other norms into workable practices on the ground.  Although the limited scope of the referred situation is not legally disqualifying, I think it significantly reduces the situation’s overall gravity. He followed up with a post asking why the Comoros are represented by Turkish lawyers in their referral request and why the referral request was only filed now. First of all, I wish to thank Opinio Juris and SHARES for inviting me to participate in this highly interesting symposium.
I want to call readers’ attention to a remarkable new report on international criminal justice authored by Daniel McLaughlin, a former legal officer at the ECCC, for Fordham’s Leitner Center for International Law & Justice. The AUMF is now nearly twelve years old. The problem of individual non-state actors acting as possible proxies for states is hardly a new problem of international law.   Deborah also discussed  the White House Fact Sheet on Use of Force Procedures, and summed it all up with a post on  what the newly released documents on targeted killing tell us compared to the leaked DOJ White Paper a few months ago.
When I was writing my book on citizenship several years ago, I wanted to take on what I thought was a standard trope of American political discourse: “the rights and obligations of citizenship. Pressing corporate social responsibility norms may not lend itself to the same sort of sexy clinical offerings as the ATS, but it may be better preparation for today’s real world of human rights practice. I didn’t intervene in the earlier discussion about Kiobel because that discussion seemed to me properly focused mostly on the internal legal aspects of the decision – everything from jurisdiction to state courts, and much else besides. Describing your interests and the topic your position paper will cover. This week on Opinio Juris, the debate on Kiobel continued. Such practice could, if observed by a significant number of States Parties, create more transparency on ICA’s through an informal method. In the second place, the dispute between SSCS and ICR raises issues relating to the subjectivity of non-state actors at the international level, and the extent to which they may make use of, or be subject to, the rules regulating international responsibility.
A comparison between the catalogues of exam-relevant topics (. 31 in the operative clauses (Part B) of the Final Document of the Third Review Conference (RC3 Final Document). The Kenyan government has asked the Security Council to pass a resolution deferring the prosecution of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto, the newly-elected President and Deputy President of Kenya. Ken Anderson argued that the ATS should be understood as the “law of the hegemon”. In an interesting (and well-timed) essay in the Boston Review, MIT’s Richard Locke sees promise in regulation by host governments, even in the developing world.
The complaint alleges that CACI directed and participated in illegal conduct, including torture, at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq where it was hired by the U. But if the referral is really being driven by Comoros, you’d think the government would be relying on lawyers in its Ministry of Justice — or at least on a Comorian law firm. 8(2)(b)(viii), unlike a violation of Art. 20(1) of the 1978 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect to Treaties.
But maybe not even with youngsters on college campuses.  I want to raise something external to Kiobel and the ATS as “law” – the distinction between international law and what (in various postings here and there) I’ve referred to as the “law of the hegemon. ”  This sentence was quoted with approval in Justice Breyer’s concurrence. In such a case, the decision of the Prosecutor shall be effective only if confirmed by the Pre-Trial Chamber.
The law really involves an ongoing constitutional powers debate between the states and the federal government over foreign affairs, and the U. This week on Opinio Juris, the debate on Kiobel continued. ) That suggests, in my view, that this new request is a “state referral” in name only — a smart litigation strategy, but a curious one. Obama declines, because there is not “near-certainty that no civilian will be killed or injured in the attack. It remains to be seen how the ICJ will approach these issues in the Whaling in the Antarctic Case, however it is to be hoped that the Court will refer to and endorse Article 48 of the ASR which provides an important avenue for public interest international environmental claims to be pursued. Let me ask what the real question is that faces us, suggest the right approach to addressing it, and outline three elements of an answer. Third, there is a question as to whether decisions of the Steering Committee are subject to enforcement pursuant to the New York Convention. This article examines these trial judgements and considers their significance to international criminal law jurisprudence and customary international law.
, are probably going to come under greater scrutiny in the next few years on account of the rise of autonomous, self-driving vehicles – the famous Google cars. The Court of Appeal of Versailles, France, ruled last week on an important case regarding the civil liability of French companies for their role in the construction of a light rail tramway system in the Israeli-controlled West Bank. A comparison between the catalogues of exam-relevant topics (. Therefore the purpose of this comment will be to highlight some questions from the viewpoint of the law of responsibility.
  In contrast, the D. The Kapo trial judgements may therefore continue to offer an extreme case example and a worthy source of common law for international criminal law jurisprudence and customary international law. ” have popped up all over the internet. Seen within the framework of US law and oversight of overseas use of force operations, however, this is an important step.
Near certainty that non-combatants[1] will not be injured or killed;
3. We also welcome ideas for different topics. Peter beat me to the punch in commenting on Samuel Moyn’s interesting take on the ATS and Kiobel in Foreign Affairs, but I’m going to add a somewhat different point from Peter’s about what the body of ATS law has meant over the past few decades. Voluntary codes of conduct are now routinely subject to institutionalized third party supply-chain monitoring (evidenced by the fact that a number of monitoring firms are themselves publicly traded companies). The Jerusalem light rail system began operating in August 2011. Shipley’s Ghost: The Right to Travel and Terrorist Watchlists. The French intermediate court’s decision may well be a landmark concerning corporate responsibility; I’m sure Eugene will tell us in his next post.
 I want to raise something external to Kiobel and the ATS as “law” – the distinction between international law and what (in various postings here and there) I’ve referred to as the “law of the hegemon.  Its general successes are also leading some to speculate whether it could assist the UN on a more permanent basis with regards to mediation and arbitration of international matters. That is a lesson we should have learned in Libya: although no one is shedding tears for the Gaddafi regime, the new Libyan government has proven all too willing to commit atrocities against groups such as the Tawerghans. As a historian, Burama sees this conflict as driven almost entirely by nationalist forces in both China and Japan (but mostly China) for contemporary political reasons rather than for deepseated historical animosities.
Along with a variety of political pressure and boycott activities, a Palestinian group sued the French-based multinational conglomerate Alstom Transport for its role in in the project. Irini Papanicolopulu highlights the important and sometimes central role that non-state actors have in the whaling disputes between Japan and Australia. How much GK is in the NKLM. They have also concluded similar conventions on other areas, covering for example the problem of hazardous and noxious substances (HNS Convention). ArrayThese interesting presentation topics can help for PPT presentations in Seminars, Conferences, for. Does their failure to do so indicate that, in fact, Kenyatta and Ruto are not actually on the same page. Acknowledged that there was a difference between the two island entities when it returned both in 1971 to Japan. 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which provides that “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer its civilian population into the territory it occupies.
But maybe not even with youngsters on college campuses.  I want to raise something external to Kiobel and the ATS as “law” – the distinction between international law and what (in various postings here and there) I’ve referred to as the “law of the hegemon. ”  This sentence was quoted with approval in Justice Breyer’s concurrence. In such a case, the decision of the Prosecutor shall be effective only if confirmed by the Pre-Trial Chamber.
The law really involves an ongoing constitutional powers debate between the states and the federal government over foreign affairs, and the U. This week on Opinio Juris, the debate on Kiobel continued. ) That suggests, in my view, that this new request is a “state referral” in name only — a smart litigation strategy, but a curious one. Obama declines, because there is not “near-certainty that no civilian will be killed or injured in the attack. Let me ask what the real question is that faces us, suggest the right approach to addressing it, and outline three elements of an answer.
Most of the article is about the Diaoyu/Senkakus.  There is a shared impulse rooted in morality, but what the hegemon does is within the terms of its own legal system.  The final draft of the article is available on SSRN here, and the article itself is available here. (An attack with a nuclear or chemical weapon, for example.  If its painful, then it is torture or inhuman treatment prohibited by international law. Siblesz noted that dispute resolution in international matters is on the upswing generally, which is a trend to note in terms of the field generally.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *